<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>TV by the Numbers - Latest Comments in Samantha Who? Again Tops New Shows, Oct 29-Nov 4</title><link>http://tvbtn.disqus.com/</link><description>TV Ratings - Nielsen ratings for your favorite broadcast and cable shows, including Late Night ratings, Syndicated ratings, Soap Opera ratings and Cable News ratings as well as DVR TV show viewing. </description><atom:link href="https://tvbtn.disqus.com/samantha_who_again_tops_new_shows_oct_29_nov_4/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:26:53 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Samantha Who? Again Tops New Shows, Oct 29-Nov 4</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/07/samantha-who-again-tops-new-shows-oct-29-nov-4/1645#comment-1815205</link><description>&lt;p&gt;C'mon, Sam Who? is utterly charming.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I love this show.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://iamatvjunkie.typepad.com/i_am_a_tv_junkie_a_blog_f/2007/11/charmed-out-of-.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://iamatvjunkie.typepad.com/i_am_a_tv_junkie_a_blog_f/2007/11/charmed-out-of-.html"&gt;http://iamatvjunkie.typepad...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@JoeWatchesTV</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:26:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Samantha Who? Again Tops New Shows, Oct 29-Nov 4</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/07/samantha-who-again-tops-new-shows-oct-29-nov-4/1645#comment-1815204</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Put Samantha in any slot without a huge lead-in and it wold be doing poorly.  Actually, it's doing rather poorly given its lead-in.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of all those shows, Women's Murder Club is the only good one, which help explain that it's not dropping like a stone like most everything else.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dirty Sexy Money and Big Bang Theory might survive because in a season of bombs, mediocre show with mediocre ratings almost look good.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;NBC has made itself a joke and Jeff Zucker should fire everyone (including himself) who was responsible for this awful mess.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;He's probably banking on the strike to kill off all his new shows without any acknowledgment of how bad they are.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rena Moretti</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 13:33:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Samantha Who? Again Tops New Shows, Oct 29-Nov 4</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/07/samantha-who-again-tops-new-shows-oct-29-nov-4/1645#comment-1815202</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What does "[Off]" mean in the list of shows at the bottom that didn't make the Top 20?  Most have it, but a couple, both CW shows, don't.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chandra</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 10:34:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Samantha Who? Again Tops New Shows, Oct 29-Nov 4</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/07/samantha-who-again-tops-new-shows-oct-29-nov-4/1645#comment-1815200</link><description>&lt;p&gt;how much of Samantha do you think is because of its lead in, Dancing With The Stars.  I think it's crazy of Fox to have put Next Great ... on a Friday.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">angela</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 00:14:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>