<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>TV by the Numbers - Latest Comments in Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbtn.disqus.com/</link><description>TV Ratings - Nielsen ratings for your favorite broadcast and cable shows, including Late Night ratings, Syndicated ratings, Soap Opera ratings and Cable News ratings as well as DVR TV show viewing. </description><atom:link href="https://tvbtn.disqus.com/nielsen_ratings_mon_march_17_dancing_is_back/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:21:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818184</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to admit, I like thus show. Sesides DH, its all ABC has. Call me a asexist, and kiss my a**, but I love these womens' dancing. This, not AI, is entertainment. Priscella Presley, Monica Seles ''' this is freaking competitiion  Kudos, ABC. This is your best show, along with Desperate housiwives. We guys will watch your shows, if you leave out the victimization crap. American women rule. Show us more strong women. Three cheers for American Dance whatever.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jay turney</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:21:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818177</link><description>&lt;p&gt;HIMYM is definately the best sitcom on TV right now, but as a self described geek I definately enjoy TBBT as a lead in.  I watched both last night.  Please renew "mother" CBS!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:15:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818167</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that lower ratings are much more acceptable today than before because of the prominence of the 18-49 demographic. Nets like NBC and the CW have focused all of their energy on the coveted demographic, though I personally think it's because HH ratings have worked against them for a while.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I also think that advertisers are more prone these days to advertise during a show with a "cult" following because they understand the power of these shows...for example, Heroes. The show hasn't really done well in HHs for a while, but still makes mega bucks for NBC. Advertisers are probably attracted by the numbers the show gets from the men demographic. One can easily tell when Spider Man 3 and Mountain Dew are heavily promoted during it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shane</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:46:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818169</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh no doubt about that, and I like the show as well. Like I said it's the geek in me I'm sure that makes it my favorite.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:01:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818168</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mark,I like several comedies more than I like Two and a Half Men, but there's no contesting Men's current ratings supremacy among sitcoms.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:52:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818171</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Also sorry for not clarifying in my post on Thursday, I just wanted the numbers for Lost last year in the 10 pm slot just to compare to what Eli Stone is doing for my own curiosity, thanks for the data.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:51:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818170</link><description>&lt;p&gt;John Ritter was a genius. The show's writers, however, not so much.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:50:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818176</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to disagree with you on big bang theory, maybe it's just b/c I'm a bit of a geek myself but I would rather watch it than any 30 min comedy on the air right now. It might not be as great as some of the classic comedies you mentioned but it's every bit as good as anything else out there currently.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:45:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818182</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems to me that NA could do really well with a better lead-in. For the last two weeks it has had sizable growth over Canterbury's Law. Where's the old FOX that would sack CL now and be airing FOX reruns next week?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John T. Folden</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:43:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818181</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;I can’t stop posting the CW’s numbers though. trainwreck, can’t avert my eyes, etc.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just &lt;i&gt;wait&lt;/i&gt; until they do the revival of 90210.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">frankj</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:15:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818180</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good to see that HIMYM grew in audience and out performed TBBT when they switched slots. It tells me that it's more the slot than it is the show. The Dec 10 8pm HIMYM episode averaged 8.3 million. The 9.73 rating was up to first season numbers! It also tells me that HIMYM has a loyal audience.  HIMYM should see even more ratings with the Britney Spears guest spot. Renew it already CBS!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jake</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:10:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818179</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've heard that too!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Though considering it's FOX we're talking about here...I suppose we'll all have to hold back the cheering until they actually put out something official.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">frankj</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:10:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818178</link><description>&lt;p&gt;frankj, indeed she is! :-) BTW, I've heard some whispering that FOX did in fact renew Terminator for a second season. I don't think it's official yet, but the spoilerTV section @ DarkUFO is reporting that Summer will be back.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:01:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818175</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;I for one wouldn’t mind if there’s a Kaley pic every tuesday… now that Summer’s off the air &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jack, she may be off the air, but she's still out there &lt;a href="http://motherofalldestiny.com/imagegallery/displayimage.php?album=238&amp;amp;pos=30" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://motherofalldestiny.com/imagegallery/displayimage.php?album=238&amp;amp;pos=30"&gt;promoting the show&lt;/a&gt;!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">frankj</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:21:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818174</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dearme: love it though other than Everybody Hates Chris I've never watched any of the shows you're dealing to TBS so I don't have an informed opinion about that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Supernatural to SciFi and Gossip Girl to MTV sounds righteous to me. But would you do something with the CW's primetime allocation? 2-4 million primetime viewers is at the very least competitive with &lt;s&gt;some&lt;/s&gt; all cable channels.  Seems like you might as well use the airspace with...something.   They're bringing Supernatural and a bunch of other shows back, so it seems like they're OK with it for at least another season.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can't stop posting the CW's numbers though. trainwreck, can't avert my eyes, etc. ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:15:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818173</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think u should now stop posting CW ratings along with the big networks, it's just awful to look at.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I really feel CW should turn into a distributor to place it's GEMS in the right place (CABLE). Reaper would do gr8 on USA, sandwiched between Monk and Psych. What do u think about the following trade?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Smallville -&amp;gt; ABC family&lt;br&gt;Supernatural -&amp;gt; SciFi channel&lt;br&gt;Reaper -&amp;gt; USA network&lt;br&gt;Gossip Girl -&amp;gt; MTV&lt;br&gt;ANTM -&amp;gt; BRAVO&lt;br&gt;Beauty &amp;amp; Geek -&amp;gt; VH1&lt;br&gt;One Tree Hill -&amp;gt; ABC family&lt;br&gt;Everybody Hates Chris, Girlfriends, Game, Aliens in America -&amp;gt; TBS&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dearme</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:59:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818172</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ron, today's great was yesterday's really bad news.  Only 10 short years ago Seinfeld had a HH Rating of 22, of course that was a wacky year where Veronica's Closet narrowly edged out Friends in HH Rating (16.8 vs 16.4) with Fraiser, Home Improvement and Just Shoot Me all pulling 12.0s.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If a 5.4 is great, the most amazing aspect of all is this: the broadcast networks even adjusted for inflation are seemingly making more money out of vastly fewer viewers. On the plus side, this walk down memory lane is probably much, much harder for NBC to stomach than it is for CBS!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:55:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818166</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just remember The Big Bang Theory's numbers are in the much more difficult 8:00.  This time of year with daylight savings time there is quite a difference between 8:00 and 8:30.  BBT got much higher numbers than HIMYM ever got in the 8:00.  This show did a terrific job on its first night in the 8:00 anchor spot.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ron</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:47:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818165</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well I don't get it. 2.5 Men constantly has big numbers (incl. repeats). I hate that show. I mean, I get it... it is a much simpler comedy where people do not have to tune in each week (yet they do) and they will laugh for 30 minutes and forget all about the show the minute they change the channel. I don't like the characters, I don't care about the characters, I don't find them amusing at all... I guess I just like a little bit more from a show I watch.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:41:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818164</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Shane, anchored by 2.5 Men, I am not at all surprised CBS has the most watched comedy lineup.  ABC's comedies (even the beloved Samantha Who?) don't hold up to 2.5 men.  While I LOVE 30 Rock, (and like The Office quite a bit) NBC's current sitcoms will never have the ratings Two and a Half Men does.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P.S. those &lt;i&gt;were&lt;/i&gt; good numbers across the board, but 2.5 Men did 14.12 million on 11/12/07...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:23:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818163</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sandy, &lt;a href="http ://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ritter" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http ://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ritter"&gt;John Ritter&lt;/a&gt;, may he rest in peace, was a comic genius.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wasn't the first to love on 8 Simple Rules or even the 1000th!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:20:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818162</link><description>&lt;p&gt;C'mon Robert!&lt;br&gt;Big Bang, HIMYM, 2.5 Men, and Old Christine did excellent and all had season highs, by the way. I would not have expected this, but CBS still has the most-watched comedy lineup on television at this time.&lt;br&gt;I'm pretty sure NBC won't hold up this well when it returns on April 3rd and 10th...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shane</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:19:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818161</link><description>&lt;p&gt;She'll be back!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ken</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:17:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818160</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congratulations to Robert Seidman for being the first person ever in the history of the world to call 8 Simple Rules a great show!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:16:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-1818159</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I for one wouldn't mind if there's a Kaley pic every tuesday... now that Summer's off the air :-(&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:03:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>