DISQUS

TVbytheNumbers: Nielsen Ratings: May 16, 2008: Au Revoir Moonlight

  • Rob · 1 year ago
    These numbers show why CBS made a right decision by canceling Moonlight. But what happened to FOX and NBC last night? I'm amazed how badly Dodgeball did
  • silverpetticoat · 1 year ago
    CBS didn't make the right decision. What did they expect? They wanted it to do badly. There was no advertising for the show. And the little they did do was misleading. Making the last episode look awful with their season finale promo only the fans could see. Also, many people around the country were going to grad nights. There was a lot of graduations going on. And besides, Ghost Whisperer only got in like 800,000 more viewers than Moonlight, and it's a more established show. So, really, Moonlight wasn't given much of a shot. But Moonlight has stayed consistent which no other shows can really say. What with the writer's strike and all. Give Moonlight a summer, the coming of the Twilight movie and Moonlight would continue to grow in numbers. So, CBS wanted Moonlight gone, so they made it happen. Hopefully, another network like CW or Sci fi will pick up the show. It gets 5 million more viewers than CW's shows. So, it'd give them their highest rated show.
  • Gwen · 1 year ago
    Rob, do you really think "The Ex-List" is going to do any better? Moonlight won it's timeslot which is more than can be said for a lot of shows. It has also show more viewer stability than many shows. Comparing pre-strike to post-strike new episodes of Moonlight lost 0.5% of its audience. CSI lost over 6%.
  • Robert Seidman · 1 year ago
    Gwen, it doesn't matter what I think. What CBS thinks is that it will perform better in the demo. I don't know whether they're right or wrong, we'll find out in the fall. While I feel badly for Moonlight fans, I really don't blame CBS for trying something else.
  • Amy · 1 year ago
    It looks like Ghost Whisperer and Numb3rs got season lows. So why only hold Moonlight accountable? The current TV season has just fizzled out at the end and young people especially have found something else to do on Friday nights. They should be looking at the number it had throughout the entire season and not just for the one or two shows when ratings all over the place were down.
  • Polly · 1 year ago
    Robert- really like the new chart. It is a lot easier to read.

    GW with a 2.0. I think their audience has fallen by about 800,000 in the last two weeks as well, if I'm not mistaken. Times are tough for the networks.
  • dearme · 1 year ago
    CBS should have replaced moonlight with a thriller rather than the ex-list, now it's gonna be like men in trees. They really should be proud of the line-up that they have on fridays, I mean 9 million every FRIDAY night is seriously huge!

    I'm really curious what CW comedies would reap on fridays and yeah even FOX's game shows and also ABC's reality shows and NBC's Life and FNL
  • Leeser · 1 year ago
    I believe that Moonlight lost viewers because they were told that the show had been cancelled, so they figured, what's the point of watching? They'd been told there would be a cliffhanger, and they likely thought they didn't want to get caught up in something like that if the show wouldn't return.

    That's a shame, as it was a very strong episode and the fans really enjoyed it a lot.

    And by the way, the fans are still working hard at encouraging another network to take on Moonlight. For example, if the CW took it on, it would have a higher rated show than it's current ratings star "Gossip Girl". The fans (and their spending money) would be right there to watch the show, too.

    If you want to know more about the fan effort, visit www.moonlight-united.com

    Leeser
    MoonlightLine
    www.moonlightline.com
    (562) 256-0910
  • Robert Seidman · 1 year ago
    Leeser, there were only ~5,000 fewer viewers, not a big drop off.

    Sorry to say, but there's no chance Moonlight airs on the CBS managed CW. Right or wrong CW is targeting younger demos, Moonlight doesn't draw them in.
  • Leeser · 1 year ago
    Then there are other networks out there who may be interested in the viewers and their money.

    I'll be happy to patronize a business that supports my favorite show.
  • LSW · 1 year ago
    I think broadcast television needs to "shift its paradigm". From the entertainment news I've been reading, the 18-34 crowd that CW and other broadcast networks are trying to cater to are not into traditional television viewing but in watching shows online. So it seems like broadcast television is abandoning the middle aged and older audience that is comfortable with television for one that is just not interested. I think they should shift their focus to making shows online for the younger crowd and shows on television for us old fogeys.

    After a few more years, there just may not be a desire for broadcast television anyway. Until this television season, I had gotten away from broadcast television and was watching mainly cable networks. This year broadcast offered some interesting looking series like Moonlight, Journeyman, Chuck, Pushing Daisies, etc. and so I tuned in again.

    It just seems like between broadcast, cable, and the internet that a show like Moonlight with a loyal audience of seven to eight million viewers should be able to find a home.
  • TV by the Numbers · 1 year ago
    LSW, I think the narrow 18-34 emphasis [and female 18-34 at that] by the CW is relatively unique to them among broadcast networks.

    The other networks and their advertisers seem to value adults 18-49 [although Les Moonves at CBS will say he targets 25-54 because that's what he gets].

    Thing is, that's not new. That emphasis on the age demographic group has been around for a very long time.

    You could argue that emphasis is driving folks outside the demo to cable, and you may be right. But I think the broadcasters are just trying to deliver the maximum number of what their advertisers want.

    And those advertisers want adults 18-49.
  • swiss100 · 1 year ago
    If I look at the numbers, Moonlight did pretty good for its time slot. Yes, while it drew only a 1.8/6 in the 18-49 group, it was the last among CBS shows that night, but did better than every other non CBS show that evening. I believe it's important when you cite statistics, that you put things in context, not just point out that they didn't do great with their share.

    The bigger point is that Moonlight also did better than every other non CBS show. That is another significant point. CBS's rationale that Moonlight didn't have the ratings I believe is simply bogus. I rather think that the cost of the show combined with the numbers didn't provide CBS the kind of rate of return they were looking for and they felt that their new show that will take it's place will do better. I highly doubt that. Only time will tell if I am right.

    The problem now for Moonlight is threefold:
    1) CBS is not going to let Alex O'Loughlin out of his contract commitments to allow him to continue with Moonlight. If they don't allow that to happen, then the show is dead.
    2) The cost of the show is going to be a much bigger issue for the smaller networks than for CBS and given that the cable networks' viewership is far less than the big three, the possible return on investment for any network taking on Moonlight is going to be an issue, even if all 7.5m viewers go with the show...which I doubt will happen. I think a high percentage of that number, perhaps 50-60% will go with the show, but I don't believe that will be enough.
    3) I am as much a fan of Moonlight (even though I'm a guy) as everyone else (can you say Sophia Myles??). However, the fans are thinking emotionally, which is a powerful motivating factor, but the harsh reality of business in the entertainment industry is that return on investment is everything. This drives every business decision that these people make...not what makes good television. This is the reason that some of the best television shows get cancelled...and Moonlight was not stellar, but it was solid and it had long term potential. The writers strike effectively killed it, since it couldn't recover from the dip in overall TV viewership, which did not return immediately when new shows returned. By that time, CBS I think had already made up its mind about the show, but held off until the last possible moment so that they'd retain viewership that they know they would have lost had they made the announcement sooner.

    Taking all these into consideration, as much as I want Moonlight to come back and while I will continue to stand with the fans trying to bring the show back, I am enough of a realist (and a businessman) to understand that the chances of bringing Moonlight back from the dead are slimmer than me being turned into a vampire. A nice thought, but not reality.

    It's very sad indeed.

    Dave
  • swiss100 · 1 year ago
    Lesser...keep up the good fight. Even though I said what I did, it doesn't mean that we shouldn't keep on fighting. If there were one show that was worth fighting for, this one is it...and you have my support.

    Dave
  • dearme · 1 year ago
    It's crazy to me how crazy some people get about sci-fi shows, u had 16 episodes in less than a year, in UK they have just 6 episodes each year and still people seem satisfied.
  • swiss100 · 1 year ago
    This is true. If you think about Stargate SG-1 and Stargate Atlantis, those shows have an incredible, and very loyal following. Thankfully, those shows are not horribly expensive to produce (thank you Canada!), so the ROR requirements are much less, and with the viewership those shows have, even though SG-1 is gone, they'll be around for a long time.

    If Moonlight gets a second chance, the writing and acting will have to be exceptionally compelling, since there will be a rather significant amount of skepticism about the show. I think they'll be up to the challenge, but it will also be a very long shot that they will ever get the chance.

    Dave
  • Rob R · 1 year ago
    Stupid NBC. 0.9 in the demo for American Gladiators?? They could have asked Friday Night Lights to finish the 7 episodes that were ordered for this season. Friday Night Lights, while no means a huge hit, would still have consistently drawn a 2.0 in the demo like it did all last year, beating Moonlight and the shows NBC aired last night. And then FNL would have pulled in another 25-30% in DVR plus 7 day viewers. Friday Night Lights would have aired its season finale last night. Yes, I am glad we are getting FNL next year, but NBC's refusal to film the last 7 episodes of this season was short-sighted.
  • Polly · 1 year ago
    Robert - Not that I really think you're wrong about the CW, but I really don't understand the logic. GG did a 1.2/3 in the demo last time it aired. Considering that the CW is close to shutting its doors according to news reports, I would think that beggars can't be choosers. You would think they would take what they could get. Heck put Jericho over there. Put on what ever you could find that had higher numbers than what you are getting now. Dawn Ostroff (sp?) must be a genius because her business sense doesn't really make sense.
  • Robert Seidman · 1 year ago
    We don't see the 18-34 numbers anymore but I looked at a random couple of weeks like the week of 10/15-10/21 where Gossip Girl had 1.13m 18-34 year olds and Moonlight had 730,000. Moonlight did have 2.753 million 18-49 year olds that week to Gossip Girl's 1.63m but more than 2 million of them were 35 and up, whereas most of GG's were 18-34.

    The total viewers that week were consistent with the normal numbers (2.41m for Gossip Girl and 7.67m for Moonlight).

    Jericho and Moonlight cost more to make and didn't attract the target youth demo, it's an equation that adds up to bad news for fans of those shows.
  • Rob · 1 year ago
    II've been watching TV for 20 years and i've been sad a lot of times when my shows were canceled. But i never had this "the network did a horrible thing, i'll never watch it again" attitude. That's just childish. Anyone who is interested in TV ratings knows CBS didn't have any solution but to cancel Moonlight. They've canceled Close To home and brought this Sci-Fi show to finally have an younger skweing show. And look at that: Close to Home pulled exactly a year ago 2.6 in demos versus 1.8 Moonlight pulls this year. And the numbers for GW and Numb3rs are just slightly down on last year's data so the "everything is way doen" excuse doesn't work. There wasn't a single logical reason for which CBS should've kept Moonlight. The fact that it's winning it's time slot isn't enough beacause it's winning the time slot but it's pulling down CBS's demo averages for the season. A CSI repeat would do better there
  • Polly · 1 year ago
    Robert - Thanks for looking at the 18-34 demo. Maybe my point is that if news articles are writing your obit you might want to look at a different business model. Since the 18-34 female viewer model doesn't seem to be working out too well, It seems that CBS and the WB (which I think own the CW) would be looking at different options. (Just threw Jericho out there because I guess they are still shopping it. Never watched it though.)
  • Peter L · 1 year ago
    Robert, any idea what ESPN's ratings were with the double header of the NBA playoffs? I'd imagine most men in the demo would have tuned into those and ignored American Gladiators and Dodgeball, which would account for the dismal ratings and demo.

    Too bad about Moonlight, it was a good show. I don't know that I'd want a second season. Revived shows never have the intensity they once did...
  • Robert Seidman · 1 year ago
    Peter, I didn't see any preliminary data for the NBA games on ESPN last night. Based on past weeks the Friday games on ESPN have been averaging roughly 2.8m-3.6m.

    Katarzyna, the ratings are live plus same day DVR viewing. Figure the additional six days will add roughly another 500,000 viewers (a little over a million total, but half of them or so occur within the same day). Numb3rs and Ghost Whisperer both had more DVR viewers than Moonlight in the live plus seven day DVR viewing results.
  • Rob · 1 year ago
    Somwe Moonlight fans should pay a visit to a specialist or something. Offending someone just beacause offers some data that is not to their liking is insane
  • Polly · 1 year ago
    Rob- You said that GW numbers were only slightly off from last year. GW pulled close to a 2.0 in the demo last year? That seems pretty low.
  • Rob · 1 year ago
    GW pulled 9.09 million/2.4 in demos while Numb3rs pulled 9.90 millions/ 2.4 in demos, so in viewers the decrease is small, while in demos is bigger for GW but a lot less for Numb3rs

    Close To Home's season/series finale pulled 10.45 millions and 2.6 in demos
  • Pat · 1 year ago
    So CBS replaced C2H, which did better than the two other Friday night shows, from what you are saying? In a year without a writer's strike. That doesn't make great business sense... In terms of Moonlight. Granted the numbers are not HUGE like a few of CBSs shows and the big shows on other networks. But I would like to point out that Moonlights numbers stayed fairly consistent across the season. From the beginning of last fall's season to the most recent episode data, CSI , an established show, has *lost* almost as many viewers as Moonlight had, that's -28% total -40% for the sacred 18-49 demo. House is down 5 million, that's -28% total and -35% of 18-49. Grey's Anatomy down almost 5 million, that's -25% total and -28% of the 18-49 demo. So there's a bleeding of viewers going on across the networks and the biggest shows on TV. Why not keep a show that was doing well (not GREAT) in it's time slot and give it time (and promotion!) to grow.
  • Katarzyna · 1 year ago
    Are these "Moonlight" ratings only for watching LIVE? What about TiVo's, DVRs and people watching the episode later on CBS' website? Do they also count?
  • Rob · 1 year ago
    These are "live+same day DVR" results. But don't worry, DVR numbers and TIVO numbers don't have a lot of influence, probably half a million more viewers for a show like Moonlight
  • Becky Key · 1 year ago
    Moonlight has consistently won its time slot and continues to do so! CBS should have never canceled this show. All across the networks, television viewing numbers are down compared to January. Taking this into consideration, the percentage that Monnlight's numbers are down is miniscule compared to other shows, including Ghost Whisperer. Also, during the month of May colleges and high schools are having graduations on Friday night so the slightly lower numbers could be caused by this.

    Last night's Moonlight episode, titled, "Sonata," was superb! The show is really hitting its stride now and this episode did not disappoint. Even my skeptical husband started watching these last four new episodes and he likes the show because it has action, drama and humor.

    Moonlight fans are not giving up on this fantastic show. We are fighting to keep it alive by presenting it to other networks...and there ARE other networks interested. We will have to see what plays out but know that Moonlight fans are unlike other fans, we are determined, dedicated, "rabid" and do not give up easily. Almost 8 million fans WILL follow Moonlight to whichever network seizes the opportunity to obtain this terrific show!
  • Moonlight Forever · 1 year ago
    Go to hell, Rob. Moonlight wasn't promoted well even before they cancelled. Additionally, it has a notoriously difficult hour for any show. Moonlight was never given a fair chance. In view of it's challenges, 7.56 is incredibly successful.
  • Polly · 1 year ago
    Rob- I guess my interpretation of slight is a little different because a drop off of 700,000 viewers from last year seems like a lot to me. However, in light of the CSI and Grey's drop offs in the millions maybe slight is the right word. ;) The demo drop off is still troubling though.
  • Rob · 1 year ago
    Polly, 700000 for GW and 200000 for Numbers is not a big drop, especially when you compare it to other shows. The same for the demos. Numbers hardly dropped at all However Moonlight lost from C2H 3 million viewers and 0.8 in demos. And again that has happened to a show that CBS hoped it would bring good 18-49 numbers. If Moonlight would've gotten 6 million viewers but 2.5 in demos CBS would've renwed the show without a doubt. But unfortunately for the show it skewed amazingly old
  • Polly · 1 year ago
    Rob - I guess that was the point I was making when I referred to Grey's and CSI numbers. I really don't like looking at C2H because no one knows how it would have performed this year. I agree with Moonlights numbers. I was just hoping in light of the strike that CBS would take (the strike) that into consideration. I think when you have a show off air for months and then let it be known that it is "on the bubble" it's a little unrealistic to expect it to perform better than it did before. Especially when most of your other shows are not performing better and you can't point to the BBT numbers because it had already been renewed so viewers weren't leary of watching it. JMO
  • Gwen · 1 year ago
    Rob- (not Robert) GW is not slightly down from last year - it is way down. It's 2006 premier was 10.3 million viewers, It's 2007 premier was 8.7 million viewers. That is a drop of over 15%. This happened in late October 2. For Friday October 19, 2007 GW had 8.92 million viewers and 2.4/9 in the demo. Compare that to a year earlier and GW was averaging 10.27 million viewers and 3.0/11. If you compare finales part 2 of the season finale for GW aired on 5/11/07 and received 9.09 million viewers with 2.6/11 in the demo. This year 8.36 and 2.0 in the demo. That is a decrease of 8%. That is more than a slight drop.

    Moonlight has also stayed more constant since the end of the writer's strike. Ghost Whisper lost 7.1% of its viewers from its post strike premier on April 25. Moonlight has only lost 5.4% of its total viewers.
  • Rob · 1 year ago
    Gwen-no matter how you see it Moonlight's numbers are bad. You compare it with GW. Moonlight bing a 9pm show should do better than GW, and it consistently lost about a million from its lead-in.
  • Doug · 1 year ago
    Regardless of ML's ratings, it's dead. Over. Poof. Gone. Get over it, because it's not coming back. After the Jericho fiasco of last year, nobody is going to pick up a marginal show again after cancelling it because fans are "upset." Because in reality, those "upset" fans may constitute 10% of the show's audience.

    Regardless of what you may think, ML's ratings aren't great, and they'd be much worse if it was not hamlocked between two hit-ish series. CBS's Friday night fortunes are stagnating and it's not going to turn that around by renewing the weakest show on the night.
  • Polly · 1 year ago
    Bill - Thanks for your link on the New York Times article about the upfronts. Very interesting. Sounds like the advertisers weren't that impressed?

    This comment probably doesn't go on this post, but don't know where else to put it. Always enjoy the variety of links that you and Robert provide.
  • Rafferty Rulz · 1 year ago
    Dear Mr. Seidman:

    You may or may not be right regarding Moonlight going to TheCW, if as you said they are skewing a younger audience. However, I would ask you to read the following WSJ article about the state of TheCW

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121089546043097...

    Nina Tassler might say no to Moonlight going to TheCW, but wouldn't you agree that Dawn Ostroff, a longtime associate and protégé of Les Moonves, might see an opportunity to stop the bleeding (TheCW has lost $2 billion and 22% of its audience) since its inception.

    Moonlight has a core audience of approximately 8 million fans. Even Nikki Finke, deadlinehollywood, reported that Moonlight has more than twice the number of viewers than Gossip Girl which could make Moonlight the most watched show on TheCW.

    I believe I read someone commenting that the cancelling of Moonlight by CBS was a business decision. I contend that a network currently loosing money, viewers and one of its lynch-pin shows (Smallville), which will be going into its 8th and possibly last season, picking up Moonlight would make a good business decision. It's a production of Warner Bros which co-owns TheCW, Moonlight has an audience that will follow it to TheCW, regardless of the viewers age. I would suspect those numbers would attract advertisers and with Twilight hitting the theaters in December 2008, I believe TheCW could use Moonlight to piggyback on the frenzy that movie will create.

    Just so you know, I've appreciated your support of Moonlight and look forward to reading your comments.
  • Robert Seidman · 1 year ago
    It doesn't matter what the media says really. Les Moonves is involved heavily in the decision making process too apparently, so I consider it obvious that both Dawn Ostroff and Nina Tassler have the green light on the Fall schedule. Does that mean they won't look back someday and think, "Wish we'd have done XYZ?" Of course not. And it doesn't mean that by November they won't completely overhaul the C-dub again, but by then Sophia Myles is very likely to have her next job. So I really don't see any way the show airs on the CW. Let me reiterate: I think there is no chance of that outcome.

    Nikki Finke's last report on Moonlight was that it's dead, dead, not coming back to life, dead. I wish I didn't agree with her and I'm sorry for the fans of the show.
  • Katarzyna · 1 year ago
    Never say never... BTW, have you ever tried to find the reasons why "Moonlight" didn't do as well as it theoretically should? Reading people's comments on TV Guide's Matt Roush article about "Moonlight " cancellation I've read the comment which made me really sick, but if you think further about it, this could be the reason why SOME people who were watching Ghost Whisperer went somewhere else for an hour and returned for Numb3rs. That person - he or she, no idea, said that he/she don't want Australian and British actors on her/his TV screen in American show. Alex O'Loughlin is Australian, Sophie Myles is a Brit, in last Friday's episode there were two more Aussies - wonderful Claudia Black (why the hell CBS didn't advertise her presence in this episode, they should know that she has quite big fan base - FARSCAPE, Stargate SG-1?) and Jonathan LaPaglia. I'm pretty certain that there are much more Americans simply boycotting Aussie/British actors in American shows and this is the main reason why "Moonlight" was loosing audience in comparison to GW and Numb3rs. I'm not familiar with these shows, but I'm pretty sure that their cast are all Americans, right?
  • Peter L · 1 year ago
    Katarzyna, you're making a lot of assumptions here. First of all, you're assuming that the same people that watch GW watch Numb3rs as well. Although I'm sure there are millions, there are not 8 million, or even 7 million. They attract two different crowds. I myself (being in the 18-34 male demo) only watch Moonlight (rare from I what read) and Numb3rs. My friends and co-workers don't watch either because most of them are tired of police and detective dramas. While my small circle of friends in the middle of New York is by no means even close to the measure of other circles around the states, I think I can confidently say that the idea of a group (if it exists) of ignorant Americans boycotting television because of foreign actors is completely inane. Why didn't they boycott the Office, a direct product of British TV? Moreover, I am avid TV watcher and only knew Sophia Myles was British because she was in an episode of Doctor Who (a British show...) and had no idea Alex O'Loughlin was Aussie until I read your post. I wouldn't believe everything you read in the comments of blogs...

    This post isn't intended to mean-spirited, I hope it doesn't sound that way, I just wanted to get my opinion across...
  • belle · 1 year ago
    House is a big hit and stars Brit Hugh Laurie.

    Anyway, Moonlight was a phenomenon as far as developing a fandom, and is an entertaining way to spend a Friday night. I'm off the beloved demo, being much too old, but hey, and must wonder why don't advertisers want my money. My usual Friday schedule this season has been Moonlight at 9, taping Dr. Who; Battlestar Galactica at 10:00, taping Numb3rs, sometimes tape or watch the Sci-Fi shows after 11. The big 3 networks should take a scheduling hint from cable and show some of their shows more than once a week.
  • Robert Seidman · 1 year ago
    Belle, NBC has tried the strategy of rerunning shows during the week (all Law & Order Saturday), as has ABC (with Grey's and Desperate Housewives) and the CW does it as well. Ratings wise, it hasn't been a winning strategy for the nets with most of the encores doing very badly. Theoretically, the broadcast nets should be trying to maximize their scale with shows that can reach at least 10 million. But that theory of scale seems to be a thing of the past.
  • shonda · 1 year ago
    When one is discussing vampires DEAD isnt an option. Vampires live forever!!! I don't understand the business side of all of this, but I know that I enjoyed watching Moonlight every single Friday night. I am hoping someone else picks up the show or CBS comes to its senses. I for one will not be watching anything on CBS, this was the one and only show I enjoyed on their network, so its not a stretch to say I wont be watching. Hope they realize the mistake they made. Women wanting to watch more women??? Ha what a joke!!!! Someone needs to get a reality check and I dont mean that crappy reality tv either.
  • swiss100 · 1 year ago
    Shonda,
    I feel your pain...the best we can hope for is another network picking the show up. That said, there are hurdles to climb, one of them being Alex O's contractural ties to CBS which could preclude him from participating in Moonlight. Another is the fact that the show is expensive to produce relative to programming on CW or SciFi (many shows made in Canada)...not to say it can't be done and so far, WB has yet to pull down the sets or told the organizers of the crusade to stop. Clearly, somebody is listening and there are efforts to save the show. We can hope, but we have to be real too, it's long odds.
  • lunarlover · 1 year ago
    I agree. Maybe it's time for the CW to focus less on its younger viewers (it has difficult to measure their numbers and how to advertise to) and go with Moonlight fans who have already committed to support any network that will pick up the show. We do realize this is a business as well and want adverisers to "buy" into the show too. Our money will go with Moonlight.
  • angie · 1 year ago
    Why is it that when a show doesn't do well, fans automatically start blaming 1) the time slot and 2) promotion and 3) the ratings system? It's like irate fans read from a manual or something! It sucks to lose a show you like (how about SciFi abruptly canceling Farscape? That still pisses me off), however, at some point logic must kick in. If people want to watch something, they will find a way no matter what.

    That said, there's no point in even trying to get Moonlight onto the CW. First, it's owned by CBS, which is controlled by Les Moonves, who also therefore controls the CW, and who pulled the plug. Also, Moonves isn't going to make the same mistake twice, by listening to fans' clamoring and bringing back a show and then having them not tune in. Jericho fans gave every sci-fi genre fan a bad name. No thanks to them, we'll likely never get a network to respond to fan furor again. And secondly, the CW only has one more year in it. As I said months ago when the WB launched its own online streaming venture, they are going to pull out next year and that will be the end of the network.

    By giving Dawn Ostroff control, Les Moonves ran the network into the ground. They aren't just targeting younger audiences--they are apparently targeting younger, STUPID, audiences. Farmer Wants a Wife? Even young people want quality program, not the trash the CW is spawning. Apparantly Dawn Ostroff & Co. is incapable of understanding this, and because of that, the network is doomed. Anything that moves to that station will die with it.

    I will mourn the loss of Supernatural. However, I will not go nutso over campaigning to get it back. At the end of the day, it's just a t.v. show.
  • Josh · 1 year ago
    I can't wait for WWE Friday Night Smackdown to move to MyNetworkTV so then MyNetworkTV can beat The CW in the ratings. Maybe next season MyNet will be in the fast national ratings.
  • Mike d · 1 year ago
    The Gladiator promos for "the beast" look like something made for the WWE, I think this show would be better off made for cable.
  • Gwen · 1 year ago
    It isn't like Moonlight was the only show that lost viewers in that slot this year. Both the Price is Right and Ghost Whisperer lost viewers when in that slot and had the number rebound for Numb3rs.
  • bristol · 1 year ago
    Please CBS bring back Moonlight that season finale was the best. Can't believe I will never see Mick and Beth again. This truely is the only show I watch except Nascar. What would it cost to bring Moonlight back?
  • Audra · 1 year ago
    I think CBS canceling MOONLIGHT is the biggest mistake that this network ever made and I pray that some other network picks this series up because I feel that CBS killed it before it really took off.

    SHAME ON YOU CBS SHAME ON YOU ALL
  • Laura · 1 year ago
    I think CBS could have gone either way on Moonlight, and that in the end it was a judgment call on their part. I understand them wanting to change the overall balance of their weekly schedule, but I disagree with how they chose to do it. Still, I'm not giving up on the chance of getting Moonlight back in some form, or on some network. Frankly, I'd watch it if it were Internet only.
  • JanSwear · 1 year ago
    I can't believe CBS canceled Moonlight. I feel the TV networks don't care what the viewers really like.

    Janice Swearengin
    janice@gdssco.com
    256-882-2361
  • JanSwear · 1 year ago
    Please bring back Moonlight.

    JanSwear
    janice@gddsco.com
  • nat · 1 year ago
    Wow, it looks like all the networks are suffering, viewers seem to be slipping through their fingers! I wonder if the Writer's Strike has had a lasting effect on them? I have to say I'm disappointed that moonlight hasn't been given a chance for a 2nd season. I don't know if this new program CBS are putting in the 9pm timeslot will do any better, it seems like a one season plot to me! And how exactly is it designed for women, the clip I've seen so far just shows women...no men... I'm not sure the idea of a women chasing after a man, for a whole season, really makes me feel all that empowered!
  • Jen · 1 year ago
    Negative people need to get a life. When your done working your part time job at stop and shop, pursue another career, instead of pretending like you know who the TV industy operates. Its foolish of you to stop a herd of Online fans trying to save their show. I never saw moonlight but must agree that I never saw any advertisments for it. Except for in TV guide, Who I think gets it right more then this site does! And as someone before me said, this isnt suppose to be a mean-spirited message, im just a no-it-all with a comptuer and internet access.
  • Guess Who · 1 year ago
    Moonlight is dead and buried. It aint coming back now matter how many bags of blood are donated. After the Jericho fiasco where the ballyhooed NUTS Campaign resulted in the loss of millions of viewers the networks arent going to listen to a few hundreds crazed fans no matter what they do.
  • Debbie · 1 year ago
    I may be naive-but I just don't get it. The network has to make money,got that, but there is SO MUCH really bad television out there. Why would you drop a program that has held its own, has class and even more possibities to show ,after one season? Is it smart to spend money on a new project when you have a diamond like MOONLIGHT right in front you? Moonlight , you will be missed. May the powers that be reconsider.