-
Website
http://tvbythenumbers.com -
Original page
http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597 -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Jack_Shephard
13 comments · 1 points
-
Steinmiller
18 comments · 1 points
-
Holly
85 comments · 3 points
-
Moderate
14 comments · 5787 points
-
Elyk988
15 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Grey's seemed flat and boring last night. I wonder if they lost viewers at the half-hour?
I DVR'd everything last night, maybe a million other viewers did as well?
Let's be fair, fewer people were watching "network" television. I was watching Red Sox/Blue Jays on NESN in New England, then some NBA on TNT.
"Scrubs" used to be must-view TV for me and I have the DVD sets of seasons 1-5 and I'll still watch it if nothing better is on. This is one time I have to go along with NBC though and try to dump some older shows to bring in something that might last 4 or 5 years instead of 1 or 2.
Thursday night is the one shot NBC seems to have to keep the demo rating and dumping Scrubs and ER could give newer shows a fighting chance.
Polly, both Grey's and CSI picked up viewers in the second half hour. Sadly we won't see the full DVR effect for a while.
Well you could show those numbers then ;)
Less snarkily, how does Nielsen measure video games on HUT/PUT? Do the meters note if TVs are on? Do they distinguish TVs on to those tuned into a broadcast, cable or satellite signal?
And Lost has pretty low standards these days, but let's not forget a couple of years ago it was pulling 20 millions.
Mix all this with the fact that ABC has renwed plenty of low rated shows i think next year will be a trouble year for this station.
It's not an anti-ABC analysis, i'm just saying ABC need to be careful or else it may end up like NBC in a couple of years
and when people talk of dvr viewers... it's not only within a week that someone watches things. what happens if 1 million people are watching shark or legal or csi after one week. they are invisible?
don't forget the same congloms that own the nets own cable channels. so any migration just brings those viewers to the same people they are migrating from.
The only reason it looks like NBC wants to keep 30 rock is so its around long enough to make it a good syndication sell. Its number are mediocre. Earl preformed better in the weaker time slot.
The office is a great deal for NBC. It looks relatively cheap to make, it pulls in great demo numbers, it gets great buzz, TBS already runs reruns and its only season 4. A spin off is NBC's best idea in a long while.
NBC Thursday night is the best night on TV.
I think it's possible its reach could be that great, but not in any way it could be regularly counted and measured so it's purely in the realm of speculation.
I'm Lost lover, btw. Loved the episode from a week ago more than last night's, but looking forward to all the remaining episodes!
I wonder if being pulled from the schedule due to the strike did some damage - maybe more casual viewers don't realize it's back (the CW promoted Reaper's takeover of the timeslot, but not Supernatural's comeback)? Perhaps they thought JIB was the end of the season. I also think Ghostfacers hurt the ratings. It was a truly terrible episode, and to have that be the first one aired after the strike . . . not good.
Tom - thanks for clarifying and your snarky comment was funny! ;) (I really hope your right about viewers comming back in the fall.)
I agree with you. I think the CW pulling the show off the air in place of Reaper confused people who dodn't know about the show even returning, and many people I've talked to didn't even know it was coming back on because they thought JiB was the season finale...I didn't mind GF, but probably not the best episode to air after coming back from a 2 month long break...thank goodness the show has already been renewed for a 4th season...
I agree with Angie too, people may just not have known supernatural was back; I have a feeling a lot of supernatural viewers only watch the CW when supernatural is on, and missed any promotion of a new episode.
http://firefox.org/news/articles/1262/1/Superna...
This might be in line with some of the sports that was going on elsewhere early.
An increase of 11 mil/view prob has also Daylight and quality of programming as the cause as well.
Plus I mean, the MAIN ratings for nielsen is the 18-49 age group....which LOST is always high on.
Every thing's good.
I work in the video industry, and I have alot of customers that do not watch tv shows when they are on anymore. They like watching all the episodes back-to-back on dvd without commericals. LOST is definitely one of those.
I think Lost's decline is also attributable to ABC's constant tinkering with the schedule. What other network would move around a big hit series like ABC has with Lost? Any other network would treat it like a treasure and build a night around it, but on ABC, it just doesn't seem to fit the relationship drama mold, so they really don't know what to do with it. Now they just seem to shove it on the schedule where there's space to fill.
The numbers are surprising. If they don't bump up to 3 mil for the final 2 I'm going to assume that we lost viewers due to: the long ass hiatus and the quality of season 3 in general, since it's been the weakest season of the 3. Lack of actual scares this season, which is what made Supernatural 'Supernatural'.
I really wish more people knew about the show. Everyone's missing out, and the more viewers we get, there's a higher probability of a bigger budget, which is obviously a good thing.
I think the huge breaks, the lack of promotion, and the cult style of the show is what has dropped the ratings.
1 LOST ABC TOTAL DVR+7 14,998
11,020 3,978 36.1% 12,893 47.1%
1 LOST ABC 2/28/08 TOTAL DVR+7 14,998, an increase over same day of 11,020 by 3,978 (percentage increase: 36.1%)